Many Thanks, and Reviews of 10/19/05 Books

First, I really want to thank everyone who posted to the previous thread--it really helped get a handle on what people's preferences were for the use of color on this site. And if you haven't commented yet, feel free to do so: I'm not ruling anything out, and it's always good to hear from people who read the site. Special thanks go to Steve Pheley for being the first to suggest tweaking the template--whether we stay with color or not, we've got a byline now right after the post title. I wish I had thought of it. I also want to thank our long-lost pal Hayden who amused Edi for hours with his "Way to lock that down" comment, but, really, anyone who took the time to comment, be it on the color or the content, I want to thank you. It's a +10 to our morale, at least.

Finally, before getting to the reviews, I wanted to address what Craig and others asked about on the thread: the dialogue posts, where Brian and I would each post on the same books, and there was a lot more give and take. We would love to do more of those, as they get the most positive feedback by far, but it seems very, very unlikely for the immediate future. It took buttloads of my time back when we did them, and at the time I was single and Hibbs was Benless. We also did it in Word and Dreamweaver in a very time-consuming way (for me), and I'm not sure there's an easy way in Blogger to replicate it.

All that said, I'm kinda sorta looking into this year's hula-hoop, podcasting, as a way for us to try something like that: get a Griffin iTalk (or maybe that Belkin thing) for my Ipod, bring it into the store on a Friday, and get us gabbing. Maybe for 2006, we'll see.

And as for this week at the racks:

AMAZING JOY BUZZARDS VOL 2 #1: I spent a lot of time second-guessing the art choices for Volume I because a lot of it seemed unclear and clumsy. I'm happy to report I found Volume II a vast improvement in this regard: storytelling choices were clean, similar looking characters were given identifiers to make one another stand out, and only a few areas where perspective seemed flattened out. In addition, the transition of the race sequence to diagonal page layouts was playful and smart. Really fun. I was a bit more put off by the writing, in that the opening sequence in particular tries to bite off more than it can chew (and there's a bit of extra 'splaining quickly jammed into an inside front cover) but this what I was hoping the first issue of Volume I would be, way back when, and consequently I'm giving this a very, very high OK. I'll be back for issue #2 and my hope is this title will continue to grow.

AUTHORITY REVOLUTION #12: This had the cruel and clever wit and enjoyably absurd one-upsmanship of impossible situations of classic Authority stories; unfortunately, it comes at the very end of what felt like a far-too-long arc. If this whole thing had been compressed down to between three and six issues, there's a chance I would have really enjoyed it. But as it is, it's a pretty Good ending to a pretty less-than-Eh run.

BANANA SUNDAYS #3: Storywise, this is the issue where the padding happens, as every question important to the reader isn't answered, and no new ones are put on the table. But I didn't care because the mix of witty (if a bit clunky) writing, and clever and assured cartooning, make this a continuing pleasure to read. A high Good.

BATGIRL #69: Since The Comics Shrew is pretty high on Andersen Gabrych's run on this, I gave this book another shot and, ultimately, liked it. While the current staus on the Lazarus Pits, like everything else in DC continuity these days, keep yo-yoing all over the place (The pits are opened, the pits are closed, they only work once, except this one, etc., etc.) I can accept it here since it's used with the end of bringing back Mr. Freeze's wife, something that I don't think *has* been done. (Fire up those correcting emails, DC fans.) I'm giving this issue only an OK because it's still part of an arc that had a hog-headed biker several issues back, but I found this a pleasant surprise and will try to keep an eye out for future issues.

BATMAN #646: I think I mentioned in a previous entry I really got into DC titles through reading Wolfman and Perez's Teen Titans, so I always thought Deathstroke the Terminator was pretty cool. However, Identity Crisis made him this year's Macarena; he's everywhere now, unavoidable, and growing more annoying each time he turns up. Maybe there's some sort of "Where's Waldo" contest going on with him I don't know about. Between his anticlimactic appearance here, and the (hopefully temporary)change in art team, I gotta go with OK.

BATMAN GOTHAM KNIGHTS #70: The Clayface virus was, uh, interesting, I suppose (although a Clayface performing the murder in the form of Alfred would have been more satisfying), but between static art, major plot-hammering, and a bunch of other complaints, I gotta go down to Awful. Too bad because some of the cops' dialogue was nicely Bendisish. I could see someone really loving this stuff, but they'd have to be doing a better job at it than the creative team is at theirs.

DAREDEVIL VS PUNISHER #5: Weird how things work. I think Lapham's art can be satisfying and, if not sophisticated, at least somewhat nuanced in Stray Bullets, but here, maybe it's the coloring or something, it seems stiff and very awkward. Now that I think of it, the final Miller/Janson issues of Daredevil did too, but the stories were compelling enough one could ignore that sort of thing, and this just isn't. Bummer to be giving it an Eh but there you have it.

JUSTICE #2: Jim Kreuger has a very set way of taking a hero or villain's defining characteristics and spinning them (I still remember, for example, his explanation as to why they call Sue "The Invisible Girl") which can be either pleasantly surprising or annoyingly pat--and, because I can't decide which, this issue, with its attribution of The Riddler's M.O. to a bit of childhood abuse, is a bit of toss-up. Also, in case you've forgotten, I live in San Francisco and got my B.A. in P.C., so a scene of natives of a foreign country bowing down and calling The Flash a god and offering him all forms of tribute seemed embarrassingly anachronistic, in tandem with the fact that The Riddler's gang were multicultural but you only saw Batman beating up the African-American henchmen, made me a little uneasy. So, uh, OK, I guess? You'll probably rate it higher if you really like Ross's art and don't come with the same unfortunate kneejerk hardwiring I do.

MARVEL KNIGHTS SPIDER-MAN #19: Pat Lee does better work here than I've seen in some time, which means he only partially causes the story to crap out, rather than trashes it entirely. (The emphasis on Mary Jane makes me wonder if David wrote the script thinking, I dunno, Frank Cho might end up on it.) Although, now that I think about it, the violent stalker fan angle seemed pretty cliched and kinda crappy without any help from Lee, so I dunno... The parts of David's script I liked, I really liked: the stuff I didn't like (and there was more of that here than in FNSM #1), I really, really didn't like. So maybe it could have been a medium OK if it hadn't been for Pat Lee's art (maybe?), but I'll go with a straight Eh.

MARVEL MONSTERS FIN FANG FOUR: Of course, that one wordless page where The Thing watches Elektro ask the FF's robo-receptionist out is pure Roger Langridge, but the rest of this seems to be a very smooth collaboration between Langridge and Scott Gray (who if I read this interview on Spurge's Comics Reporter correctly, had a hand on piecing a lot together on the Marvel continuity end of things). I found it very enjoyable, although the menace seemed kinda silly and unthreatening, which was the only offnote in a piece that blended whimsy and seriousness with a nice balance. I may have enjoyed this even more than Powell's Devil Dinosaur/Hulk issue, because it was longer and gave the characters more of an "arc." Again, my kneejerk P.C.ness would have appreciated an introductory context about the Fin Fang Foom reprint but that's just me. A high Good.

MR. T #2: Goddammit. I bet we only got one copy of this for the racks (maybe two) and it was gone before I made it to the store Friday. Rats.

NICK FURY HOWLING COMMANDOS #1: Oh, man. I was actually pitying the poor sonsabitches who preordered this three months ago and then still had to buy it after reading those awful preludes printed in every Marvel book for the last three weeks and then, of course, at the end of the day, I realized one of those poor sonsabitches was me. This book was an enormous slipshod piece of Crap, with lousy, ugly amateurish art, garish, painful coloring, and dull, stilted writing. The last part really stings since I, like probably everyone else, pre-ordered this on the strength of Keith Giffen's previous work. I mean, don't get me wrong, I think the art really killed this, and made reading it a fucking horrible exercise in eyerape, but looking at the elements of the script separately, I think only a very good artist could have made this a decent read: it starts with a lot of action, but, by the end, only Clay Quartermain (introduced in the second half) is anything other than a cipher. This is the kind of book one's embarrassed to have in their collection. I can't even think about it without wincing. Heinous, heinous Crap.

ROBIN #143: Why did I pick this up? I haven't been following this book at all, but if they're all like this, they should change the title of the book to OTHER PEOPLE (GUEST-STARRING ROBIN!) That alone puts it at Eh, but the rest of it is nothing to write home about, either.

SEVEN SOLDIERS KLARION THE WITCH BOY #4: There's a whole narrative leap there (Klarion merging with his cat) that I didn't follow at all (and maybe also that very abrupt opening) but man, I really enjoyed this issue, and this whole mini overall. I admit Morrison made his villain a little too Millarish (i.e., very "Would you like some RAPE with your RAPE?" in his dialogue), but so far, this was only second to Guardian. Let's go with Very Good.

SHAOLIN COWBOY #4: Motherfuckin' yes. I didn't finish this, but unless the last eight pages featured the Shaolin Cowboy and his mule sitting around knitting (and maybe even if it does) this kicks extraordinary amounts of ass (pun unavoidable). The art is so impressively crafted and drawn, it elevates its innate stupidity into some previously uncharted realm of genius, all the more because Darrow is doing so very deliberately. I can't think of the appropriate metaphor to describe this (it's like if Richard Wagner was resurrected and staged an opera based on Three Stooges shorts? Or if Alejandro Jodorowsky was hired to write new Bugs Bunny cartoons for Warner Brothers?) but don't let my sputtering ineptitude dissuade you. If extravagant absurdity is even remotely your thing, then this is your thing. Very Good, for sure.

SHE-HULK 2 #1: This is also Very Good work, in a very different way from Shaolin Cowboy (just as SC #4 is from Klarion #4 above it). I'm kind of in awe of Slott's scripting here--he squeezes a "don't wait for the trade" argument perfectly into his previously established meta-commentary; he simultaneously critiques and integrates She-Hulk's behavior in Avengers Dissembled into his series; and makes a book about a superpowered lawyer both packed with comic book action and comic book law. Equally good is Bobillo's art, which is delightfully expresive and sympathetic. I hope that, similar to how Runaways picked up readers in its reboot, this book does the same and gets a genuine chance in the direct market. It deserves it. As I said, Very Good.

SUPERMAN #222: Oh, come on now. That's really, really dumb. Even if I buy all the other Infinite Crisis related plot hammering, am I really supposed to believe that Superman, fearing for his lack of control (or whatever), replaced himself with robot and didn't bother to mention it to his wife? I'm kinda stunned that this is the same Mark Verheiden who's been working on Battlestar Galactica this season (although I thought the episode with his name as scripter was easily the worst of the season to date) because that show goes to some pretty great lengths to make the characterization seem natural, and this--well, this really doesn't. Awful.

SUPREME POWER HYPERION #2: I skipped issue #1 of this, and thought issue #2 kinda screwed the pooch: JMS went to such great lengths to introduce superpowers throughout the regular series that introducing (at least) three people with them at the same time, out of nowhere, really kills the atmosphere he was going for. Now it's just a superhero book with swears (swears to leave soon, I guess). Plus, the art, by Dan Jurgens and Klaus Janson, makes this look exactly like an issue of The Defenders from the mid-'70s, and although that's actually a compliment in my book, I know that won't hold true for hardly anyone else. Bottom of the Eh.

ULTIMATE FANTASTIC FOUR #24: The people behind the Ultimateverse seem aware that the Marvel Universe had a disprorportionate amount of orphan superheroes, but I wish someone other than Mark "hatched from an egg" Millar had handled the return of Sue and Johnny's mother: her characterization isn't flat, it's frickin' concave. Maybe it'll all pan out if Ultimate Submariner has some of the innovation of Millar's recharacterization on The Ultimates, but this left me even more underwhelmed than the zombieverse story of last arc. Eh.

ULTIMATE SPIDER-MAN #84: By contrast, I thought this came very close to perfectly paced--a big ol' punch-up scene contrasted with a humorous phone conversation and a surprise change 'em up. Bendis and Bagley's Spider-Man is starting to remind me less of the "regular" Spider-Man and more of Bugs Bunny, but that's not such a bad thing, somehow. Hard to believe this book might be back on track, but this pretty Good issue suggests that might be the case.

WALKING DEAD #22: Even though Rick had a pretty good point about everyone being deeply unhinged and about ready to off themselves, he still came off as a sanctimonious asshat. I'll give Kirkman credit that he did so deliberately since Rick himself is also one of the deeply unhinged, but taken on its own terms the scene was pretty flat. The story is at a point where the more sophisticated he can be in detailing everyone's deterioration, the more satisfying it'll be when everything really hits the fan. I'll go with Good, but reservedly so.

X-MEN #176: Didn't read any of the previous issues but this perfectly sums up the strengths and weaknesses of Peter Milligan's characters: the better-known the characters are, the duller and more out-of-character he writes them (The Black Panther--chatty? Ororo--prissy?), whereas the lesser-known the characters are, the more interesting and closer to in-character he writes them. The talking hypno-baboon not being able to count to five, and Red Ghost and his two Super-Apes (where the servile Super-Apes able to see the failures of communism far better than the zealous Ghost) were terrific (credit should go to Larroca's art, which really sells the Apes' scenes). Get these guys off X-Men and put 'em on a Red Ghost and The Super-Apes miniseries. Eh, but worth flipping through.

PICK OF THE WEEK: Hmm, I guess the real standouts for me were all in the esses, but of the three I'll go with Shaolin Cowboy #4 for doing so much with so little.

PICK OF THE WEAK: Nick Fucking Fury and His Fucking Fucking Howling Fucking Commandos #1, fucking fucking fucky fuck.

TRADE PICK: I'm looking forward to sitting down with the Chiaroscuro TPB, one of my very first "wait for the trade" mistakes, but the Black Hole HC is the book I keep picking up, again and again, kind of in awe at its actual presence. And I've also got Plastic Man Archives Vol. 7. Good stuff.

Hmm. Okay, so hopefully we'll get Hibbs' take on some of this stuff on Tuesday; a few of my reviews this week seem suffer a bit from the "this book has too much blue in it so I give it an Eh," maybe. Let's see what he has to say.

When You Have A Minute?

Can you sound off in the comments on how you feel about the colored text: does it help you tell who's writing what, or can you generally figure it out pretty quick? If we do end up adding a mysterious personage (or...two?) to our ranks, I'll either have to (a) set up some sort of different style for each writer so they don't have to go through the hoops I do to get colored text; or (b) drop the colored text altogether. I know what I'd prefer, but I very much want your opinion: what works best for you?

Reviews of some 10/12 books

Once again, in no particular order. Really fighting the deadline this week -- lost a bunch of time this weekend, and had a longer-running than it should have doctor's appointment this morning (waiting room, nothing to do with me) We're going to have some really terrific news for you in 2-3 weeks, as a Mysterious Personage has agreed to join the Savage Critic team, and I think you're going to be damn happy with the snark and resources they'll bring. I know I am anxious to see how it works out.... but soon on that, not today.

So, as fast as I can....

HOUSE OF M #7: Judged purely on the 22 pages between the covers here, I pretty much thought this was a success. With a few exceptions of storytelling in the battle sequences (who did what to who now?), this moved along like a rocket, happily setting up the next bit of the story. I do think Bendis has problems with things spiraling out of his hands (a of that talk about "kids gloves coming off", but it didn't seem all that different than a "normal" fight to this reader), and, had this been issue #3 of the comics, I think we'd all be cheering for how good it was.

On the other hand, this was issue #7.

Still, I'm down with trying to "stuff the genie back into the bottle" -- the X-Franchise *has* spiraled completely out of control in the last decade, and anything that can make it more compact and accessible is a good thing. On the other hand, launching 2 new monthlies and 5-6 mini-series out of the aftermath of this does seem a bit counter intuitive, doesn't it? I like Phil Boyle's joke that there will be 198 mutants left, and each one is going to get their own title....

Still, I'm pretty curious about how the mechanics of this are going to work out -- Wanda evidently had the power to CHANGE HISTORY (still not sure about how *that* worked, really), so one might logically assume that any "No More Mutants!" wish would have gone into effect retroactively, but I can't really see how that could work with current continuity.

(From the "retail intelligence" POV, we sold 107 copies of INFINITE CRISIS #1 as of 11 am this morning, but only 69 copies of HoM #7. Also, our generic X-MEN sales are at their lowest point in the 16 years I've had my own shop -- we're down to below 40 copies of some issues of the main 2 titles in the last quarter, which is frighteningly sad. Hell, when Morrison was doing the book, we were selling in the 120 copy range. ANd that's not even a historical peak or anything.)

Anyway, I liked these 22 pages enough to call it a middling GOOD, though the entire min-series is stil probably lingering in the EH range.

JLA #120: This is the way to celebrate a tenth anniversary, isn't it? With a wholly putrid piece of shit masquerading as a Justice League comic book. It's hard to imagine a more bungled or boring issue, with a lot of standing around and blabbing and moaning about why they should put the JL back together. Um. You're all standing right there, guys, why are you even saying it broke up in the first place? If that wasn't bad enough, there's some sort of hoopty-ass touchy-feely ceremony bullshit where they're dropping sand in the wind or some shit. Who the fuck wants to see super heroes act like a bunch of middle aged attendees of a New Age festival? But the cake has to be taken by the fifth- or sixth-stringer Raven Manitou Dawn (or whatever the fuck her name is) having some sort of bullshit vision of J'onn. I mean, first off, what's she even doing here, second off why would j'onn contact HER of all people, and third, I'm surprisingly unconcerned about the where abouts of the invulnerable, shape-changing, able-to-go-intangible Martian Manhunter. Clearly, there's not a chance he actually blew up on the moon. This is what comics-by-committee yield, and I guess shouldn't be much surprise that this piece of tripe was foisted upon us by Bob Harras, the lead man for the absolute nadir of X-MEN continuity of the 90s. Here's my best example of the editorial ineptness of this whole package: someone breaks out of jai, all shadowy darkness and foreshadowing... but we're never told WHO it is within the actual pages of the comic. Instead, we have to learn from the next issue box that (be afraid!) The Key has escaped. Even Morrison wasn't able to make him an actual threat of anything against anyone. This comic was so bad that it gets my below-CRAP rating: this was ASS. It's not just crap, it's where crap COMES from.

HAWKMAN #45: As long as I'm being pissed off by bad comics, I want to thoroughly object to the ridiculous bait and switch involved here with "Oh, sure, Dr. Fate teleported me away, and created an illusion" bullshit. That's not playing fair with the AUDIENCE, guys. AWFUL.

100 BULLETS #65: I've lost the main thread of the plot (at least a year back, maybe more) though confusing character shifts and byzantine plot mechanisms, but I still look at this every issue because of Risso's fucking fabulous artwork. Which is good, because I really thought this issue was terrific and made me have a great deal more faith in Azzarello's writing ability. Top notch material, and really gripping: VERY GOOD.

VILLIANS UNITED #6: I have to say that I can't, for the life of me, figure out the two Luthors thing, or what any of that is supposed to be (At least back in the day there used to be some physical differation between multiple-earth variants of a character -- even if it was "Yellow Circle"/ "No Yellow Circle"), but despite that this twist seem ed like less of a twist than a gyre, I thought this was the only one of the Countdown mini-series that provided a strong and compelling story in and of itself. I liked it: a solid GOOD.

METADOCS THE SUPER ER: I review wayy too many DC and Marvel books, I think -- so I'm going to try to be conscious of that over the next few weeks and offer up a bit more of a mixture if I can (though slight this week because I'm almost out of time for the day). This is a very nicely done stand alone comic about a Super Emergency Room -- it got bogged down, I think, in some of the medical terminology and such, but the characters were reasonably compelling and the art serviced the story well. A very strong OK, and if you're looking for something super, but different, this might be the thing for you.

7 DAYS TO FAME #1: this really could have been exploitive and crappy (the premise is a reality show that shows suicides), but I thought this eluded many of the pitfalls better than I thought it would, and found a nicely human core to do the idea. Not great, but a solid OK.

Annnnnd... I'm out of time. 10 minutes until teh delivery truck shows up with the NEXT batch of comics, sheesh. Sorry I didn't cover more....

So, PICK OF THE WEEK: Take your pick from 100 BULLETS #65 or FABLES #42 (Which I didn't specifically review) -- both were very solid, and crisp and pretty.

PICK OF THE WEAK: Oh come on, no contest: JLA #120.

BOOK / TP OF THE WEEK: 3-way tie on ASTRO CITY: LOCAL HEROES TP, DOOM PATROL v3 TP, or GREEN LANTERN: REBIRTH HC. All super-stuff, but all very different approaches to the genre, and all well worth your coin.

More in 7 more, and another step closer to our Big Announcement (which will become anti-climatic once it comes, probably, because I've built it up too much. Well, I think it's cool, at least.

As always, what did YOU think?

-B

PS To the Comics Shrew: Jesus, get out of my head, girl! I made a point of not reading any IC #1 reviews until I typed mine up, and hers are almost word-for-word mine. Scary! The Comics Shrew is MY personal favorite reviewer that isn't on this site, so that's either very very good, or very very bad, your call...

Hibbs will probably have to eat a bug, and shipping 8/24

Just because I am a big enough man to admit when I was wrong, I stumbled across a post in the Comic Book Industry Alliance boards from 3/2/01 where I said this about ULTIMATE SPIDER-MAN: >>>LONG TERM...I really really really don't think it will succeed. By the time it hits issue #50, how is it really going to be any different than the "real" Marvel universe, RE: the accretion of history? If it makes #100, I'll eat a bug.<<<

While I do think the line has become SOMEwhat inaccessible now because of that accretion of history, I was clearly really really really wrong, and it seems all but inevitable that ULTIMATE SPIDER-MAN will, in fact, make it to #100.

(Unless something were to happen to Bendis. And we wouldn't want that. No.)

So, although I have a year-ish to go before the actual #100, I post this for 2 reasons: A) I know my memory, I WILL forget about this by then. You are now being pressed into Keeping Me Honest when that day comes. and B) I am entertaining suggestions for What Kind of Bug I should eat.

My especial apologies to Brian Michael Bendis and Mark Bagely for doubting their creative acumen, and to Joe Quesada and Bill Jemas for doubting their marketing instincts. They were right, and I was wrong.

****

Here's what is shipping in to Comix Experience this week: the usual cavaets about how this may or may not be similiar to what arrives in YOUR Local Comic Shop apply. Different Diamond warehouses receive books at different times, there can be manufacturer error, maybe I fucked up and didn't order something I should have, etc. etc. ad infinitum.

A G SUPER EROTIC ANTHOLOGY #18 (A) ADVENTURES OF SUPERMAN #643 ANGEL THE CURSE #3 (OF 5) ANT #1 ARCHIE & FRIENDS #94 ARCHIE DIGEST #219 BANANA SUNDAYS #2 (OF 4) BATMAN #644 BATMAN JEKYLL AND HYDE #5 (OF6) BATTLE POPE COLOR #2 BLACK PANTHER #7 CARTOON NETWORK BLOCK PARTY #12 CITY OF TOMORROW #5 (OF 6) CONAN #19 DAREDEVIL #76 DAREDEVIL VS PUNISHER #3 (OF 6) DAY OF VENGEANCE #5 (OF 6) FANTASTIC FOUR #530 GIFFENS WHAT WERE THEY THINKING ONE SHOT GLOOMCOOKIE #24 GOD THE DYSLEXIC DOG #3 GROUNDED #2 (OF 6) HELLBLAZER #211 HULK DESTRUCTION #2 (OF 4) INVINCIBLE #25 IRON GHOST #3 (OF 6) JACK CROSS #1 JSA CLASSIFIED #2 KNIGHTS OF THE DINNER TABLE #106 LEGION OF SUPER HEROES #9 LETHARGIC LAD JUMBO SIZED ANNUAL #3 LITTLE STAR #4 (OF 6) MACHINE TEEN #4 (OF 5) MARVEL KNIGHTS SPIDER-MAN #17 MEGA MORPHS #2 (OF 4) MONSTER WAR DARKNESS VS MR HYDE #4 (OF 4) MUTATION #2 NEW X-MEN #17 NIGHTCRAWLER #9 OMAC PROJECT #5 (OF 6) OTHERWORLD #6 (OF 12) PURGE BLACK RED & DEADLY #2 (OF 4) QUEEN & COUNTRY DECLASSIFIED VOL 3 #3 (OF 3) RISING STARS VOICES OF THE DEAD #3 (OF 6) SIMPSONS COMICS #109 SPELLBINDERS #6 (OF 6) STRANGE GIRL #3 SUPER MANGA BLAST #54 TEEN TITANS #27 ULTIMATE X-MEN ANNUAL #1 UNCLE SCROOGE #345 WALKING DEAD #21 WALT DISNEYS COMICS & STORIES #660 WOLVERINE #31

Books / Mags / Stuff AUTHORITY REVOLUTION BOOK 1 TP BATTLESTAR GALACTICA VOL 2 MEMORY MACHINE TP CATWOMAN WILD RIDE TP COMICS BUYERS GUIDE NOV 2005 #1610 COMICS JOURNAL #270 DAMPYR #5 UNDER THE STONE BRIDGE HANK KETCHAMS COMPLETE DENNISTHE MENACE 1951-1952 HC HISTORY OF VIOLENCE NEW TP NEW EDITION HOWLS MOVING CASTLE FILM COMICS VOL 1 TP ILLUSTRATION 05 MAGAZINE #1 IRON WOK JAN GN #12 (RES) LITTLE LULU VOL 5 LULU IN THEDOGHOUSE TP MARVEL VISIONARIES CHRIS CLAREMONT HC PREVIEWS VOL XV #9 (NET) ROBIN ARCHIVES VOL 1 HC ROCCO VARGAS WALKING WITH MONSTERS HC SHIRLEY A SEX COMEDY VOL 1 TP(A) SIN CITY VOL 1 DURO ADIOS HARD GOODBYE SPANISH ED SLOP ANACLETA TP SMOKE #3 (OF 3) SPIKE OLD TIMES ONE SHOT SUPERMAN THE MAN OF STEEL VOL4 TP VAMPIRE HUNTER D VOL 2 NOVEL RAISERS OF GALES SC WAR ON FLESH VOL 1 GN (OF 3) WESTERN GOTHIC BALLAD OF UTOPIA TP

What looks good to you?

-B

(who should have reviews up sometime tomorrow, and thinks Jeff's "Topless version of Gremlins" line in his reviews this week (just below this message) was the funniest and most insightful thing I've read this week)

Super Synergistic Internet Machine...Go!

Jeff here. I took a week off from reviews so I could focus on the CE newsletter this week, but hope to get back to the task this weekend. Wanted draw your attention to Bri's latest Tilting At Windmills, now posted over at Newsarama. As always, sharp and topical work which I found particularly satisfying after all the time I spent this week trying to figure out what to say about Infinite Crisis #1.

Also, I'm very pleased that Tom Spurgeon used a suggestion of mine for his excellent Five For Fridays at the Comics Reporter, asking readers to list five books loaned or lost and never returned/recovered. (I know I'm not the only person still haunted in the dead of night by loaning a then-complete set of Eightball to a flaky guy in L.A. who never returned them and then went on to briefly become an MTV VJ.) I've got a whole day at the comic store where I'll be able to compile my ultimate list of regrets, but be sure to email Tom your tales of woe as well.

Second of Three Fanboy Columns.

Okay, the "Salute to Content" week continues, with the second Fanboy Rampage column, dealing with the return of my evil twin, now up. June's installment will be posted tomorrow. I bought an Adaptec PCI card for my PC yesterday, figuring it was finally time I got some USB 2.0 ports in my PC, and it's been sheer hell getting the thing installed. Of course, I have no idea what I'm doing and, of course, the instruction manual makes it seem like it's the easiest thing in the world and, of course, it turns out there are conflicts between my BIOS and earlier versions of the card and I should make sure that Bus Mastering Support is provided and enabled for the PCI slot, yadda, yadda, yadda. Someday our bald, big-headed descendants will look back on the shit we went through and laugh their three asses off (I haven't decided yet whether each descendant has three asses, or if there are only three asses for the collective mass of them).

First of Three Fanboy Columns.

Okay, so true to my word, I've begun catching up on posting the Fanboy Rampage columns I do for the CE newsletter and will add links here each day as I upload 'em. It's, like, content! Kinda! So first up, we have a look at DC's timeline of Infinite Crisis, and my own particularly berserk spin on it, although if DC doesn't end up using "two Ectobane pizzas from beyond hypertime..." I'll be bummed. And I know I'm wayyyyy behind the curve on this, but Hawk & Dove action figures?? Wha? I was in Target yesterday, stopped by the action figure aisle on a lark, and got knocked on my ass over these. I got the action figure monkey off my back several years ago but between my purchase of this set and DC Direct's Composite Superman, I wonder if I'm not slowly falling off the wagon. Christ, I hope not.

"Why are you always so negative?"

Got a comment in the Talk Back of last week’s reviews that I thought might be bigger consideration than just responding there were no one would see it. A “Brian” (no last name) wrote: "Whew! Thanks for telling me what stinks, guys! Now I know I don't need to come into your shop and spend any money!”

Which, while fabulous in its snarkiness, actually does bring up something I get a lot: “Why are you so negative all of the time?”

So, let’s go over some of the reasons you’ll find negative reviews here.

First, and foremost, I usually hear it from people who say some variant of “You’re a retailer, your job is to sell.” But, here’s the thing: I don’t see my job as being that specifically limited – my job is to sell, sure, but I see that over the long run, not the short run.

It is like with Variant Covers: some retailers adore the things because “It is like getting a free $100 bill!” Which, of course, it is. But I believe that in the long run taking that $100 can cost you THOUSANDS of dollars in sales as we drive people away from the entire hobby.

In exactly the same way, my job isn’t “just to sell” – it’s to sell QUALITY MATERIAL. If I can discourage someone from buying a shitty-ass comic, then it is at least marginally more likely they’ll buy something good; something that puts the burning need to buy MORE comics within their heart.

What you have to understand is that there’s a fine line here that I constantly try to be smart about. What you see in cold hard type isn’t the same thing you’d necessarily hear on the sales floor – I try very hard to remain positive in the store because a customer there may or may not be interested in my opinion. However, if you’re here, on this website, you CLEARLY WANT my opinion.

On the sales floor, I won’t offer my opinion UNLESS it is solicited, and even then, I tend to try and remain neutral in my phrasing (“It isn’t really my kind of book,” that sort of thing)

There seems to be a supposition that what is said here has direct influence upon the sales floor. After 16 years of selling comics for a living, and more than a decade of internet reviewing, I think I can laugh pretty hard at any connection.

Some of the worst reviewed comics here are the tip-toppest sellers in the store. Look at something like Bendis’ AVENGERS: I absolutely think it is pure crap on a stick, but it has steadily been our #1, 2, or 3 Marvel seller each and every month it has been released.

Understand: most (60-90%) periodical comics are sold by the end of the first weekend. It is incredibly rare that Jeff or I get reviews up in time to influence periodical buying.

Further, every effort I’ve ever made to study it shows that negative reviews simply do not impact even upon our long-term sales of periodical comics. People buy what they want, and reviews have only the most minor of impacts upon those choices.

Ultimately, post-Wednesday reviews have almost no impact upon initial sales – at best, they can be addative to the NEXT time you go into a store. But if you’ve already decided to not buy NEW AVENGERS, I’m not going to make you buy it less.

Another key factor for me, at least, is that negative reviews illuminate the interests of the reviewer AT LEAST as much as positive reviews. If you like all of the books that I hate, then you’re going to approach my positive reviews differently than you would otherwise.

Personally, I HATE reviewers that only give positive reviews – this seems intellectually dishonest to me, and “You catch more flies with honey than with vinegar” is really only helpful if you’re trying to catch flies.

What I think is that by being HONEST about my opinions, even if it COULD cost me a sale, means that you’re going to value my recommendations all that more. You know I’m not trying to sell you a bill of goods, or whatever happens to be “hot” or whatever.

Further, judging from my email (though seldom the “Talk Backs”), comics professionals generally “appreciate” a negative review more than positive ones. Quite often I’ll get the “Yeah, it’s flawed, and here’s the behind-the-scenes bit you didn’t know”. Joe Casey, not withstanding. Kurt, Sean, Ed, Warren, etc. all of you read my reviews on a semi-regular basis, maybe you could post in the Talk Back if there’s any value to you in here?

Now, if the criticism is that we (well, mostly I) don’t do a good enough job OF explaining WHY I don’t like something, that one is probably valid. I like to think I bat at least .400 though.

Finally, and the point that really trumps any other one: Jeff and I post largely for ourselves. We make no money from this website. There are no banner ads, this is not a profit-making affair (quite the opposite, in fact). I post on MY time (barring the weird odd occasion like this one where I use the AlphaSmart from the counter), time away from playing video games or hanging out with the family or whatever. We don’t get paid for this, barring an incredibly rare PayPal donation or something, so what I’m hoping for is that I’ll make someone (usually Jeff) laugh.

That’s much easier to do in a negative review than a positive one. When was the last time you laughed when I said for the 86th time “USAGI YOJIMBO is an excellent comic that everyone should be buying”? Yeah, exactly.

This is the internet; people LIKE rants. We get thousands of hits, and are usually featured at or near the top of many “blog rolls” every week because of that. It seems to me we must be doing SOMEthing right.

I’m certainly willing to have a rational conversation about the pros and the cons of the approach we take here – please feel free to use the Talk Back to tell me I’m right or wrong, and I listen to all of it. Though I listen far more to people who sign their full name to their opinions…

What do you think?

-B

EDIT after I wrote that: there's a message that follows "Brian"'s, from "Rob L'Heureux" which I thought should also be put on the front page. Here's the whole thing:

" I usually agree with your reviews and pick up your recommendations that I haven't read and sometimes drop titles if I agree with your criticism. But occasionally I think you just miss the mark, the latest two examples being the ASTONISHING X-MEN and FABLES. The art on both titles is exceptional, well above the current standard and using the medium to advantage ( especially FABLES ), and I always enjoy the storytelling. A book like ASTONISHING, where everything seems to have been done with the characters and the writer has to handle these ‘moneymakers’ so gingerly, I mean, this is a monthly serial but the writer still finds fresh material and presents it in an entertaining fashion.

These books haven’t changed my life but I really think a serious critic ( and retailer ) would encourage this level of work. Readers should be encouraged to support these titles, creators should be encouraged to strive for this level of storytelling ( or better ), and publishers should be encouraged to promote and produce more in kind. All of which would help the comic industry.

Sometimes you seem to hold some titles / creators to a higher standard and I hate you. "

I'm curious as to what other people think, though I will note that I gave ASTONISHING an "OK" and FABLES a "GOOD" (!) Am I TOO harsh?

-B

Somewhat Annoyed

As Lester noted, it was, in fact, APE weekend (had a loverly time, thanks!), and newsletter week and, I just wanted to spend some quality time with Ben, so there went time for the reviews. I actually sorta wanted to write some up today (at least my SIN CITY movie review -- next week, sure), despite my TILTING AT WINDMILLS deadline hanging over my head (due Friday, 0 words written, no solid topic in my head), but I decided to go play hooky and try and meet Gene Wilder at a book signing at the Balboa movie theatre this afternoon.

So, I get there about 90 minutes early, and there's just a handful of people standing around the lobby. "What's the deal?" I ask, "Do we have a formal line or something?" The cashier tells me that the signing is at 5:30, right when YOUNG FRANKENSTIEN gets out, and that theatre patrons will form a line when the screening is done. People who DON'T see the movie have to wait until AFTER all of the theatre-goers are done, and, so, they might not get to meet Mr. Wilder, who will leave at 7.

So, that sounds fair, I guess. Well, "fair-ish" at least. And spending 90 minutes waiting in the dark cool movie house is better than 90 minutes on a cold windy street. I also beleive in supporting local theatres, because, y'know, fuck those big multiplexes. I buy a ticket and go in, though that wasn't my plan when I arrived.

So, the movie gets out, I'm the 5th or 6th person out of the theatre's door, and I walk into the lobby, and, um, there's a really long line, and Mr. Wilder is already signing. "Um, where's the line for the people who saw the movie?" I am pointed out the door, with the general line. Well, that's kinda fucked up, ah, but what the hell, I'd really like to meet the man, tell him how much pleasure he's brought me, shake his hand.

So, I start for the line, then I notice the sign: "MR. WILDER WILL NOT BE SIGNING _ANYTHING_ OTHER THAN HIS NEW BOOK." I turn back towards the signing table, and, yup, I see the current person up for signing being told emphatically "No" when he wants a WILLY WONKA movie poster signed. Well, shit -- I can't really say if I want his signature on a book I haven't even read yet. Y'know what I mean? I had brought an old ratty VHS copy of THE LITTLE PRINCE (he was The Fox -- what a great adaptation of the original novel!), and my DVD of WILLY WONKA. THOSE what I wanted signed, not the book. I was even intellectually ready to BUY a copy of the book, if I had to -- but what I wanted SIGNED, to discuss for 15 or seconds or so, maybe, were those works.

So, I'm weighing if I should ask if I could BUY the book, and have Mr. Wilder sign something else ('cuz, y'know, that's probably going to come off as offensive to the author -- he's here to promote something CURRENT, not decades old work), then they make The Announcement. "Because far more people showed up to see Mr. Wilder than we expected, he will be unable to personalize your copy. It will be autograph only." Which, to me, sorta DEFEATS THE PURPOSE OF A SIGNING, and, y'know, encourages the people there to get an autograph so they can just sell it on eBay later, but what do I know?

So, I left. Oh sure, I could have used this very time to write some reviews, but I decided for once to use the internet for it's intended purpose: venting. In a blog.

-B

Recipe for a Great Excuse....

APE+Upcoming Newsletter+comix left at store+family crisis=no reviews from me this week, more than likely. When I talked to Hibbs, he was doubtful he'd get something in either. That may change if he gets a fire lit under him, or if my workplace is so incredibly slow tomorrow I can sneak in some reviews when nobody's looking. But I wanted to give you guys a head's up that if there was gonna be a week we were gonna miss altogether, it'd probably be this one.

Fanboys, New and Old

Wow, this is turning out to be our week of content. Since my latest Fanboy has to do with summer movies of note, and since I stretched the very conception of "summer" to include the April 1 opening of Sin City, I wanted to put it up while it still carries two or so days of potential trenchant relevance. On a similar note, with Frank Miller's Sin City opening soon and some of us having gone back and reread a bunch of those fine beauties, I thought I would also link to an old FBR, wherein I try to imagine Frank Miller's Jesus!

New Content! (Kinda!)

Hookay, the reviews this week are either coming verrrry late (as in early next week), or they ain't coming. (Newsletter + Wondercon + some very unavoidable personal appointments=Jeff weeping, tearing what's left of his hair and fighting with his girlfriend over who gets the last bit of milk) However! Because I had some problems with my new computer and video game addiction and stuff, the last three installments of Fanboy Rampage weren't put up...until now. Coverage of our Geoff Johns signing, thoughts about DC Countdown (and Christmas), and brief comments about Will Eisner's passing are now available for your perusal. See? Just like comic book reviews! Only....not.

Is this thing on, yet?

I've been trying since late Tuesday night to post, but, for some reason, it keeps getting stuck in "publishing post" Since it is now Thursday, I think posting "comics this week" and the week/weak/book from last week seems pointless... but I pretty much promise I'll have a full length Critic written by Monday morning with this week's books. I'm getting itchy, y'see.

Let me also remind you, if you're in the SF area, we have GEOFF JOHNS here on SATURDAY, OCTOBER 30, from 4-7 PM. We haven't done a signing in half a decade, so this should be a fun little event.

See you soon, I swear, with actual reviews....

-B

The Weak, Book and Week for 10/13

So, since I'm still getting my computer's house in order, and since I had the new TILTING AT WINDMILLS up at Newsrama, and since I got into it in a few threads (also at Image Comics' BBS) and since Jeff's on Vacation so that means I have to solo ONOMATOPOEIA (even if it is only 8 pages this month), so that means no full length Critic last week. Wah. I figure the least I can do is sort through the Picks and the Books.

So, Pick of the Week: Not the greatest week in the world, really -- many things in my personal in-box disappointed me from the ASTRO CITY A VISITORS GUIDE (I don't much care for the Who's Who portion of the content, though it was laid out intelligently as a nice mimic for the type of guidebook it emulates) to SECRET WAR #3 (Huh, jumping all over the narrative might not be the best trick for a quarterly mini-series), so the best thing I think I read this week was POWERS #5. Felt like an "old-school" issue of Powers.

I also kinda want to give it to THE COMICS JOURNAL #263, excpet that's not a comic. I really like TCJ under Deppey, and this might have been the first issue where I read 90% of the pages in a lonnnng time.

Pick of the Weak: Much easier, the work that disapointed me the most was SUPERMAN: TRUE BRIT HC. Really really not funny, nor worth the $25 price tag. Wow, a stunning indictment of the British Tabloid press, both a hard target, and just what we're looking for. *le sigh*

The TP/GN of the week is a much trickier thing... lots of good choices like HARD TIME, or the complete ULTIMATES V 1 HC, even MY FAITH IN FRANKIE (except I hate the digest format), but I think I'm going to give it to the nice thick LOCAS HC. That's a real value right there.

Hopefully (though I doubt it) a full column next week...

-B